The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have taken their battle over the Phala Phala saga to the Constitutional Court. On Tuesday, the court will hear the party’s arguments challenging Parliament’s decision to dismiss an impeachment investigation into President Cyril Ramaphosa’s alleged misconduct.
Revisiting the Phala Phala Scandal
The EFF seeks to hold Ramaphosa accountable for the February 2020 burglary at his Phala Phala game farm, during which large sums of foreign currency were allegedly stolen. The party alleges the president engaged in criminal conduct linked to the incident and failed to report the matter appropriately.
This legal battle implicates Ramaphosa, the National Assembly, and the African National Congress (ANC). The EFF argues that the president’s actions demand full accountability.
Parliament’s Rejection of Impeachment
In December 2022, the National Assembly rejected the African Transformation Movement’s (ATM) motion to impeach Ramaphosa. The motion stemmed from an independent panel report led by retired Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, which found grounds to believe Ramaphosa may have violated the Constitution.
Despite this, Parliament dismissed the panel’s findings, with the ANC leveraging its majority to block further action. Ramaphosa also challenged the panel’s report in the Constitutional Court, arguing its conclusions were flawed.
Legal and Political Implications
The EFF’s move places the issue of presidential accountability back in the spotlight. This case could set a precedent for how impeachment investigations are handled in South Africa, as the Constitutional Court has yet to comprehensively define the legal framework for removing a sitting president.
The EFF maintains that Parliament cannot disregard an independent panel’s findings without legally valid reasons. If successful, the case could redefine the criteria for presidential accountability and Parliament’s obligations in such matters.
Julius Malema’s Call to Action
EFF leader Julius Malema has accused Ramaphosa of corruption and failing the country’s democratic standards. Speaking at the Gauteng Provincial Assembly on Sunday, Malema warned of dire consequences for South Africa’s future if the president is allowed to evade accountability.
Malema also announced plans for mass protests to demand action against Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala scandal. The EFF is expected to hold a press briefing on Monday to outline its plans for their elective conference in Johannesburg next month.
A Defining Moment for Accountability
The Phala Phala case continues to have widespread political and legal ramifications. As the Constitutional Court weighs in, the decision could reshape how presidential misconduct is investigated and dealt with in South Africa. For Ramaphosa, the stakes extend beyond his presidency, potentially influencing the broader framework of democratic accountability in the country.
Comments